Commodities: Industrial Metals Copper

JJC Top Performer Intra-day
Price $29.77
Today’s Change +0.31%(1.04)
3:59pm 06/23/2017
CUPM Bottom Performer Intra-day
Price $29.03
Today’s Change 0.00%(0.00)
4:00pm 06/09/2017
  • Overview
  • Efficiency
  • Tradability
  • Fit

ETF.com Insight

Although there's only three funds in the Copper segment, investors must select carefully because the differences between the funds are significant, and can lead to big performanceThere are four important distinctions to make... differences over time.
Between the funds in the Copper segment, there are four important distinctions to make: product structure; rolling strategy; expenses; and liquidity. Two of the three funds (JJC & CUPM) are structured as ETNs, so investors bear the counterparty risk of their issuer, Barclays, unlike CPER, which is structured as an ETF. Investors will have to pay up to eliminate counterparty risk, however, as CPER's expense ratio is significantly higher than JJC and CUPM.
Another significant differentiator between the funds is their roll strategy: Two funds (CUPM & CPER) attempt to mitigate the yield-eroding effects of contango, whereas JJC is a first-generation product. JJC sticks to front-month futures contracts, whereas CPER and CUPM optimize the contracts they select to reduce the harmful impacts of contango. It's also worth noting JJC is the only product with reasonable liquidity and the only fund not at high risk of closure. (Insight updated 06/23/17)

All Funds (3)

JJC $57.45 M 57445960.8 Most liquid

C 77
E
70
70
T
93
93
F
77
77

CUPM $633.09 K 633092.07 High risk of closure

D 97
E
75
75
T
54
54
F
97
97

CPER $12.67 M 12665647.5 Very expensive

F 0
E
54
54
T
46
46
F
0
-1

ETF.com Grade as 06/15/17

Commodities: Industrial Metals Copper

1 Year Total Return NAV
Performance  [as of 06/22/17] 1 Month 3 Month YTD 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years 10 Years
Benchmark: S&P GSCI Copper0.53%-1.44%3.21%20.86%-5.23%-4.62%--
C 77JJC57445960.8JJCiPath Bloomberg Copper Subindex Total Return ETN-0.12%-2.50%2.43%21.06%-8.06%-6.92%--
D 97CUPM633092.07CUPMiPath Pure Beta Copper ETN2.45%-0.50%4.66%27.01%-4.97%-5.43%--
F 0CPER12665647.5CPERUnited States Copper Index Fund-0.12%-2.38%2.91%19.16%-7.11%-6.29%--
All returns over 1 year are annualized. All returns are total returns unless otherwise stated.

ETF.com Efficiency Insight

None of the funds are highly efficient, but the two ETNs, JJC and CUPM, get a nod for charging significantly lower expense ratios than CPER. Between the two, JJC is 10 bps cheaper, but itsJJC is 10 bps cheaper, but its realized fee will vary based on performance realized fee will vary based on performance. That translates to less predictable tracking results that, in the past 2 years, have tended to be significantly higher than the headline rate. CUPM's tracking results are much more stable by comparison.
CPER's high fee is a side effect of its commodity pool structure and low assets—it has significant tax accounting expenses, which are largely fixed costs that must be spread across the fund's tiny AUM. Should the asset level pick up, the fee will go down.
Speaking of asset levels, only JJC has attracted any significant interest from investors. Its two peers are at high risk of closure, and will likely be difficult to trade unless they manage to attract more capital. (Insight updated 06/23/17)

All Funds (3)

75
74.601879
70
70.230274
54
53.781504

ETF.com Grade as 06/15/17

Commodities: Industrial Metals Copper

Tracking Difference (12 Month)

Ticker Expense Ratio Median Max. Upside Max. Downside Max LT/ST Cap Gains Rate Rule Legal Structure Fund Closure Risk Efficiency
CPER United States Copper Index Fund 0.79% -1.06% -0.10% -2.07% 27.84% / 27.84% High 53.781504
CUPM iPath Pure Beta Copper ETN 0.85% -0.67% -0.57% -0.84% 20.00% / 39.60% High 74.601879
JJC iPath Bloomberg Copper Subindex Total Return ETN 0.75% 0.76% 3.22% -2.32% 20.00% / 39.60% Low 70.230274

ETF.com Tradability Insight

JJC is by far the most liquid fund in the segment. Trading volume in the other two funds is dismal at best, and comes with wide bid/ask spreads. In contrast, JJC posts impressive volumeJJC posts impressive volume most days most days, which contributes to much tighter spreads. Investors trading in bulk can have their choice, however, as all three funds score well in block liquidity. Those looking to get the best price on CPER and CUPM would do well to trade a full creation unit directly with the help of an AP. (Insight updated 06/23/17)

All Funds (3)

93
92.772741
54
53.73256
46
46.21929

ETF.com Grade as 06/15/17

Commodities: Industrial Metals Copper

Ticker Median Daily Volume ($) Average Spread Creation Unit/Day Market Hours Overlap Underlying Volume/Unit % Creation Cost Per Unit (%) Impediment to Creations Score - Tradability
CPER United States Copper Index Fund $17.0 K 0.90% 0.02 100.00% -- 0.04% None 46.21929
CUPM iPath Pure Beta Copper ETN $0 0.57% 0 100.00% -- 0% None 53.73256
JJC iPath Bloomberg Copper Subindex Total Return ETN $886.21 K 0.13% 0.60 100.00% -- 0% None 92.772741
Spread History
Premium/Discount History

ETF.com/ Block Liquidity

CPER
5
4
3
2
1
CUPM
5
4
3
2
1
JJC
5
4
3
2
1

This measurement shows how easy it is to trade 25,000 shares of each ETF.

ETF.com Fit Insight

All of the funds in the segment use futures contracts to attain 100% exposure to copper, so the differences between the funds come down to contract selection and the consideration paid toJJC is the only fund in the segment that turns a blind eye to contango contango. JJC is the only fund in the segment that turns a blind eye to contango, and simply selects the front-month contract closest to expiration.
By comparison, CUPM and CPER attempt to optimize the contracts they purchase to mitigate the decay that stems from a term structure in contango. CUPM selects the contract that exhibits the least contango, whereas CPER places its eggs in multiple baskets by using a laddered mix of 2 or 3 contracts that are less impacted by contango.
In deeply contangoed markets, we expect CUPM's and CPER's strategies to outperform relative to JJC. However, JJC's liquidity and low-fee advantage may trump any benefits from contango mitigation. (Insight updated 06/23/17)

All Funds (3)

97
97
77
77
N/A
0

ETF.com Grade as 06/15/17

Commodities: Industrial Metals Copper