Why You Don’t Need Both The Palladium And Platinum ETFs

By
Devon Layne
November 30, 2012
Share:

Investments in precious metals are growing more popular as investors seek to protect against volatile markets and a weakening dollar, but investors may not need exposure to both palladium and platinum ETFs, as their movements share a similar correlation to economic growth, according to an article on Zacks.

Both metals have continued to attract attention throughout the year, but unlike gold and silver, these two precious metals are subject to industrial needs more so than investing demand, writes Eric Dutram, contributor to the Zacks article.

Still, their short- and long-term movements do vary. For investors interested in short-term gains, the ETFS Physical Palladium Shares (NYSEArca: PALL) is probably best, while the ETFS Physical Platinum Shares (NYSEArca: PPLT) might be better suited for those focused on the long term, according to Zacks.

Visit Zacks.com to read more on the topic at hand.

 

ETF DAILY DATA

The bond funds 'HYG,' 'TLT' and 'JNK' added money on Wednesday, March 25, as total U.S.-listed ETF assets dipped just below $2.1 trillion.

A number of iShares funds, including the bond funds 'TLT' and 'HYG' paced the firm's issuer-leading inflows on Wednesday, March 25. Total U.S.-listed ETF assets meanwhile dipped to just below $2.1 trillion.

ETF.COM ANALYST BLOGS

By Dave Nadig

How Ric Edelman is reinventing the ‘new economy’ investing paradigm.

By Olivier Ludwig

What’s cooler than an ETF with a ticker like ‘HACK’? The way investors are using it.

By Olivier Ludwig

Yes, 2015 is shaping up to be the ‘year of currency hedging,’ but that’s not necessarily a good thing.

By Elisabeth Kashner

ETF.com steps in to referee a catfight that has erupted in the world of robo advisors.