Blog

Sibling Rivalry: SPLV & SPHB

March 14, 2012
Share:

Mounting signs of a recovering economy make me wonder if it’s time to view defensive plays as a way of getting left behind.

I understand why last year investors piled into the PowerShares S&P 500 Low Volatility Portfolio (NYSEArca: SPLV), a low-volatility play on the S&P 500 Index. After all, Shakespeare would recognize 2011’s equity returns: full of sound and fury signifying nothing.

SPLV now has $1.56 billion in assets, but perhaps its moment has passed.

Equity volatility, as measured by the CBOE Volatility Index, continued its downtrend this week, with another big drop on Monday.

More broadly, a steady if unspectacular stream of positive economic indicators—most recently this week’s retail sales data—points to recovery, if not outright expansion.

If all this is true, is SPLV’s overshadowed sibling, the PowerShares S&P 500 High Beta Portfolio (NYSEArca: SPHB), due for its time in the sun? It’s worth a look. Here are returns since the market’s most recent nadir on Oct. 4 of last year:

SPHBvsSPYvsSPLV_10.4.11

SPHB has screamed back at 36.6 percent while SPLV has delivered 15.2 percent. I’ve got the SPDR S&P 500 (NYSEArca: SPY) in there too, splitting the difference at 24.3 percent, as you might expect from a beta-one fund

Looking further back to May 5, the inception date of both funds, returns are again widely dispersed, but with SPHB’s on the losing end.

The two ETFs diverged most dramatically three months after launch, when the August 2011 downgrade of U.S. Treasurys roiled markets. PSHB in particular nose-dived while SPLV merely dipped.

SPHB is still struggling to catch up to SPLV after this downturn, with returns since inception of -9.1 percent, while SPLV has gained 10.3 percent.

SPHB vs SPY vs SPLV: Inception

SPHB’s history of returns is too short to support rigorous regression, but visually it does indeed look like the fund delivers what it promises: high beta.

It’s worth noting that SPHB juices up returns without resorting to leverage. While leverage has its place, funds with double- or triple-exposure, or even inverse funds, can have undesirable side effects over longer periods, as my colleague Devin Riley made clear in a recent blog.

My biggest concern on SPHB isn’t about beta or leverage, but instead about the nature of its basket.

 

ETF.COM CHANNELS

Want to learn more about smart-beta ETFs? Check out our smart-beta guide, essentials library and ETF screener!

ETF DAILY DATA

'EFA,' the developed-market fund that excludes North America, led inflows on Thursday, June 25. Total U.S.-listed ETF assets meanwhile fell to $2.162 trillion.

'EFA' paced iShares' issuer-leading inflows on Thursday, June 25, as total U.S.-listed ETF assets dipped to $2.162 trillion.

ETF.COM ANALYST BLOGS

By Drew Voros

Why is putting a client’s interest first not the industry standard?

By Matt Hougan

Contrarian plays, bad investing and authenticity in social media dominated the day.

By Dave Nadig

While they bring added risk, they can bring added returns.

By Olly Ludwig

The ETF world is a hotbed of interesting new ideas, as this week’s launches make clear.

ETF INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVE

By Invesco PowerShares

Smart beta appears to be poised for further growth.

By Dorsey Wright & Associates LLC

So many sectors, how do you choose? A quick guide from Dorsey Wright.

By Nasdaq Global Indexes

Bond exposure or bond performance? Only defined maturity indexes provide the latter.