Stay Connected!
ETF News Daily
ETF News Weekly
Sign up to receive ETF.com's newsletters.
U.S. Edition
Search Ticker
Paul Britt
ETF.com Analyst Blogs

Sibling Rivalry: SPLV & SPHB

Related ETFs: SPY | SPLV | SPHB
Share:

I understand why last year investors piled into the PowerShares S&P 500 Low Volatility Portfolio (NYSEArca: SPLV), a low-volatility play on the S&P 500 Index. After all, Shakespeare would recognize 2011’s equity returns: full of sound and fury signifying nothing.

SPLV now has $1.56 billion in assets, but perhaps its moment has passed.

Equity volatility, as measured by the CBOE Volatility Index, continued its downtrend this week, with another big drop on Monday.

More broadly, a steady if unspectacular stream of positive economic indicators—most recently this week’s retail sales data—points to recovery, if not outright expansion.

If all this is true, is SPLV’s overshadowed sibling, the PowerShares S&P 500 High Beta Portfolio (NYSEArca: SPHB), due for its time in the sun? It’s worth a look. Here are returns since the market’s most recent nadir on Oct. 4 of last year:

SPHBvsSPYvsSPLV_10.4.11

SPHB has screamed back at 36.6 percent while SPLV has delivered 15.2 percent. I’ve got the SPDR S&P 500 (NYSEArca: SPY) in there too, splitting the difference at 24.3 percent, as you might expect from a beta-one fund

Looking further back to May 5, the inception date of both funds, returns are again widely dispersed, but with SPHB’s on the losing end.

The two ETFs diverged most dramatically three months after launch, when the August 2011 downgrade of U.S. Treasurys roiled markets. PSHB in particular nose-dived while SPLV merely dipped.

SPHB is still struggling to catch up to SPLV after this downturn, with returns since inception of -9.1 percent, while SPLV has gained 10.3 percent.

SPHB vs SPY vs SPLV: Inception

SPHB’s history of returns is too short to support rigorous regression, but visually it does indeed look like the fund delivers what it promises: high beta.

It’s worth noting that SPHB juices up returns without resorting to leverage. While leverage has its place, funds with double- or triple-exposure, or even inverse funds, can have undesirable side effects over longer periods, as my colleague Devin Riley made clear in a recent blog.

My biggest concern on SPHB isn’t about beta or leverage, but instead about the nature of its basket.

 

 

Discussion

Post a Comment
Comment:
(Max. 2,000 characters)
Name:
E-mail:
Home page: (optional)
CAPTCHA Image Reload Different Image
Type in the
displayed
characters:
Email follow-up comments to my e-mail address SUBMIT