Blog

Parsing Low Vol And Low Beta

May 29, 2012
Share:

Think low volatility and low beta are the same? Think again.

Russell offers two ETFs that track modified versions of the Russell 1000, one with a low-beta strategy (NYSEArca: LBTA), one with a low-volatility strategy (NYSEArca: LVOL).

Over a three-month time horizon, each of these funds delivered sufficiently divergent returns to make me want to understand what the difference means to investors.

Here’s what I found:

Over the three-month time horizon starting Feb. 17, nearly 5 percentage points of returns separated LBTA and LVOL, with LBTA eking out actual gains. As the graph below shows, LBTA finished in the black, gaining a little over 1 percent, while LVOL fell about 3 percent.

VOL vs LBTA Price Performance

A 5-percentage point difference over three months is nothing to scoff at, so it would be best to stop using “low-beta” and “low-volatility” synonymously and find out what separates these two factor-based approaches to investing.

The answer is that beta is a relative measure and volatility is an absolute measure. Let me explain.

Beta measures how much the price of an asset moves relative to the movement of the market. Volatility, on the other hand, is an absolute measure of price fluctuations in the asset and pays no regard to movements in the broader market.

We generally expect the two measures to yield similar values because most assets exhibit some significant level of correlation with measures of the “broader market.”

As an investor, if I were looking at a low-volatility portfolio I would expect to find assets that also have low betas. Conversely, inside a low-beta portfolio, I would expect to find assets that also exhibit low volatility.

As it turns out, not only is neither assumption theoretically sound, but empirical evidence also suggests the contrary.

 

ETF.COM CHANNELS

Want to learn more about smart-beta ETFs? Check out our smart-beta guide, essentials library and ETF screener!

ETF DAILY DATA

U.S. and international equity funds led net inflows of $5.15 billion on Thursday, May 28, bringing total U.S.-listed ETF assets to $2.165 trillion.

'SPY,' 'XLF' and 'XLV' paced SSgA's issuer-leading inflows on Thursday, May 28, as total U.S.-listed ETF assets rose to $2.165 trillion.

ETF.COM ANALYST BLOGS

By Olly Ludwig

The ETF world is a hotbed of interesting new ideas, as this week’s launches make clear.

By Olly Ludwig

Yields will one day head higher, so is it time to get bond exposure outside the U.S.?

By Rachael Revesz

Stop dancing around the subject, call women ‘women’ and let’s be a more visible part of this industry.

By Olly Ludwig

It’s no secret that hedge funds love ETFs, but what’s less appreciated is that their love of ETFs will likely spell their demise.

ETF INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVE

By Nasdaq Global Indexes

Bond exposure or bond performance? Only defined maturity indexes provide the latter.

By Invesco PowerShares

Invesco PowerShares and Market Strategies International’s second annual survey provides vital insights about smart beta and ETFs overall.

By Invesco PowerShares

Investors are implementing smart-beta exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in their portfolios in a variety of ways and for different reasons.