A massive strike at platinum mines in South Africa has set off a domino effect, inspiring similar strikes at properties mining everything from gold to chromium. For investors holding gold mining ETFs, this should set off alarm bells.
That’s because the labor unrest currently enveloping South African mining properties has sent South Africa’s currency, the rand, into a tailspin. On Monday, the currency hit a three-year low, and there’s no bottom in sight.
Since a fair amount of the world’s precious metals production comes from South Africa, investors in gold mining ETFs need to take a step back to re-evaluate how the currency risk will impact their portfolios moving forward.
Since March 1, the rand has fallen 16 percent against the U.S. dollar, and more than half of that loss has come in the past month alone.
Six gold miner ETFs currently compete for investor dollars, with subtle differences among them that produce different portfolio exposures.
Of the six funds, only one—the Global X Gold Explorers ETF (NYSEArca: GLDX)—has no exposure to South Africa. Among the other five, only one—the Market Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (NYSEArca: GDXJ), has less than 10 percent of its portfolio in South Africa.
What separates GDXJ and GLDX from their competitors is the mandate each fund follows. GDXJ targets junior gold mining companies, the majority of which are still in the exploration phase and haven’t begun producing. GLDX only targets exploration firms, hence the moniker “Gold Explorers.”
Smart beta isn’t smarter than cap weighting, but it is different, and that’s great for investors.
Trial by fire is one way to discover why ETF transparency matters.
Most people now realize leveraged ETFs can hurt you, but how, then, to use them?
What would a shift out of a mutual fund and into an ETF look like up close?