Dear Mrs. Buffett,
I am writing in response to your husband’s well-penned advice to you for investing your inheritance. Warren made waves by recommending you invest 90 percent of your cash in Vanguard’s S&P 500 ETF (VOO | A-96).
Warren likes VOO because it’s broad-based and cheap. VOO costs a measly 0.05 percent per year, or just $5 for each $10,000 invested; replicating a basket of U.S. large-cap stocks doesn’t take many resources these days. But VOO comes with opportunity cost, because it omits midcaps, small-caps, foreign companies and firms that have short-term earnings struggles.
Warren is the world’s most respected investor, and he should direct you to Vanguard’s most complete index fund. Vanguard’s Total World Stock ETF (VT | B-100) delivers the whole world to your portfolio, for just 0.18 percent a year.
I hope Warren has many more years upon this earth, for your sake and for the sake of investors everywhere. I am particularly grateful for his recent support of index investing, as he reminded us that a healthy dose of humility is a key ingredient to successful lifelong investing.
“The goal of the non-professional should not be to pick winners—neither he nor his “helpers” can do that—but should rather be to own a cross-section of businesses that in aggregate are bound to do well.” —Berkshire Hathaway Annual Report, 2013
Your husband has spent a lifetime understanding businesses and estimating their worth.
He has earned the right to be snarky about picking winners.
“Most investors, of course, have not made the study of business prospects a priority in their lives. If wise, they will conclude that they do not know enough about specific businesses to predict their future earning power.”
He has famously insisted on staying within his “circle of competence”—focusing on businesses that he understands, buying them at bargain prices. Warren sticks with what he knows.
He recommended you invest your inheritance in the world’s most recognizable index—the very one that most American investors cite. The S&P 500 Index is as familiar as Cherry Coke.
But if you and Warren apply the famous Buffett scrutiny to the S&P 500 Index, you might be surprised by what you find.
What’s Not In The S&P 500
For starters, the S&P 500 is a U.S. large-cap index. The S&P 500 misses out on midcaps and small-caps, and on many of the world’s best businesses.
Moreover, the 500 securities that it does hold are not, as most assume, the top 500 U.S. stocks by market cap. They’re actually a curated subset of the top 1000 stocks, more or less. The S&P 500 Index rules require that a company post positive earnings for the most recent quarter, and, in the aggregate, the past 12 months. The S&P index committee then chooses its 500 firms from among those companies that pass all its screens.
Warren knows all about choosing stocks. But he does things differently.
According to Berkshire Hathaway’s March 31, 2014 13-F regulatory filings, more than 25 percent of Berkshire’s portfolio of 45 publicly traded companies—12 stocks, to be exact—are not in the S&P 500.
|Company||Market Value of Berkshire's Stake ($M)||Berkshire Ownership Percentage||Market Cap ($M)||Earnings Per Share ($TTM)||Reason for S&P 500 Exclusion|
|Suncor Energy Inc.||500.9||0.9%||51,462||1.90||Non-US|
|Liberty Global plc - Class A||330.7||3.4%||32,232||-3.39||Negative earnings|
|Liberty Global plc - Class C||315.0||1.3%||32,232||-3.39||Negative earnings|
|Liberty Media Corp||678.6||4.6%||14,945||68.97|
|Verisk Analytics Inc.||94.9||0.9%||10,003||2.09|
|Chicago Bridge & Iron Company||774.9||8.8%||9,407||3.35||Non-US|
|Media General Inc.||85.3||5.2%||7,533||-0.18||Non-US, Negative earnings|
|WABCO Holdings Inc.||436.0||6.7%||6,473||4.65|
|USG Corp.||1,302.1||31.5%||4,497||-0.19||Negative earnings, Midcap|
|Lee Enterprises Inc.||0.4||0.2%||239||-1.52||Negative earnings|
There are four reasons these fine firms don’t show up in the world’s most famous index.
- They’re incorporated outside the U.S. Sanofi (French) is a perfect example, as are Canadian Suncor and Media General, and, surprisingly, Dutch-incorporated Chicago Bridge & Iron.
- They’re not large-caps. Starz Inc. is well under the S&P 500’s $4.6 billion large-cap cutoff. Tiny Lee Enterprises wouldn’t even make it into S&P’s Small Cap 600 because it’s under the $350 million cutoff.
- They failed S&P’s profitability screens. Liberty Global and USG Corp. both lost money over the past 12 months. The S&P methodology requires positive quarterly and 12-month trailing earnings, so these Berkshire holdings don’t make the cut.
- S&P’s index committee passed them over.
Let this last point sink in for a minute.
S&P’s index committee has effectively bet against Berkshire on Liberty Media, Verisk and Wabco. Starz didn’t make it into the S&P MidCap 400, either, so add Starz to the bet-against-Berkshire list.
The S&P 500’s screens—for recently profitable, U.S.-incorporated, large-cap firms—have caused the world’s most famous index to exclude some of your husband’s best ideas.
Passive investing has a deep humility at its core—the aim is not to separate winners from losers, but rather to hold the entire market. The S&P 500 doesn’t hold the entire market.
Vanguard offers many fine index funds—none of them broader in focus than the one I mentioned above: the Vanguard Total World Stock ETF. VT is as close as you’re going to come to the entire global equity market.
VT holds all 504 securities in the S&P 500, plus 5,673 others. You’ll get exposure to Nestle, Roche, HSBC, Toyota, Samsung and BHP Billiton, as well as up-and-coming U.S. firms like Tesla and LinkedIn.
While VT doesn’t reach far enough into the micro-cap realm to pick up little Lee Enterprises, it holds every other publicly traded Berkshire Hathaway-portfolio company, plus 6,666 more.
Elisabeth Kashner, CFA
Director of Research
Thanks to CNBC’s Warren Buffett Watch for publishing the Berkshire Hathaway Portfolio Tracker. http://www.cnbc.com/id/22130601
At the time this article was written, the author held no positions in the securities mentioned. Contact Elisabeth Kashner, CFA at firstname.lastname@example.org.
A low-volatility emerging markets ETF outpaces its plain-vanilla counterpart as it marks its three-year anniversary.
It may have been inadvertent, but the SEC’s ruling to block nontransparent active ETFs is a real plus for investors.
Knowing what ‘yield’ even means is a crucial requirement for ETF investors.
Industry movers worry ETF trading belies weak bond liquidity.