The Commodity Investor: US Presidential Election History Suggests This Is Good Time To Buy Gold

By
October 24, 2012
Share:

Gold reacts more positively to post-election certainty and stability than to who’s in the office.

 

With the presidential election only a few weeks away, the American electorate is being bombarded on an hourly and daily basis by information (some of it accurate, most of it not).

With so much information out there, it can be very confusing for investors (as well as voters) to determine what’s relevant from what’s frivolous and what’s accurate from what’s misleading. In this week’s column, The Commodity Investor will examine the current state of political and economic affairs and provide some insight into the coming election and what it means for your portfolio.

Before we delve into specifics, we have to ask the all-important question: Do presidential elections affect the markets?

Unfortunately, while this is a straightforward question, the answer is not as simple as investors would like. For example, while studies show that the stock market performs better under Republicans during the first year after an election, studies also show that the market performs better during the overall four years under a Democratic president.

Specifically, markets increase 75 percent of the time under a Republican president versus 58 percent of the time under a Democratic president during the first year of office. However, during the total four-year term in office, markets perform better under Democrats than under Republicans by a factor of almost 2-to-1.

Those figures may change depending on several external factors. For example, it depends if the incumbent party loses or wins a second term. Markets decidedly favor stability and tend to perform much better during the second term of an incumbent president rather than the first term of an incoming president.

Specifically, markets have historically increased by 15 percent if the incumbent president wins a second term versus a drop of 5 percent if the incumbent president loses.

So all in all, it would seem that markets favor incumbent Democratic presidents in the long term. However, this isn’t an exact science. There are so many other political factors that have to be taken into consideration, such as the political control of both houses of Congress, fiscal policy and budgetary planning.

The bottom line is that presidential elections do have an effect on the markets and your portfolio, but it is not an exact science. Therefore, The Commodity Investor does not recommend taking portfolio decisions solely on the basis of presidential politics—it is an additional metric to use, but certainly not the only one.

 

ETF.COM CHANNELS

Interested in China? Use our China ETFs Channel, library, and ETF screener.

Interested in oil? Use our oil ETFs channel, library and ETF screener!

ETF DAILY DATA

The gold ETF took in nearly $860 million on Monday, May 2, as gold prices spiked near $1,300.

SSgA and Invesco PowerShares saw the largest ETF outflows of all issuers on Monday, May 2.

ETF.COM ANALYST BLOGS

By Drew Voros

With the broad equity ideas all taken, issuers look for thinner slices of exposure.

By David Lichtblau

How funds wash away capital gains through create/redeem process.

By Dave Nadig

End investors are the big winners; brokers—not so much.

By Dave Nadig

ETF industry petitions the SEC for market microstructure changes.

ETF INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVE

By Sprott Asset Management

New fund’s underlying index targets equities sentiment on social media.

By Kristi Kuechler

Avoid taking unrewarded—or unintended—risks.

By Vanguard

The investing giant outlines its expectations for the markets and global economy in 2016.