Fulton: PowerShares Fee Cuts No Price War

By
December 04, 2012
Share:

Recent fee cuts on six Invesco PowerShares funds are aimed at institutional investors, Ben Fulton says.

 

It’s tempting to think that PowerShares’ latest fee cuts on six ETFs means the No. 4 U.S. exchange-traded fund provider is jumping right in and joining iShares, Vanguard and Schwab in what many are calling a fee war in the U.S. ETF industry.

Not so quick, Ben Fulton, head of Wheaton, Ill.-based Invesco PowerShares told IndexUniverse.com Correspondent Cinthia Murphy. While the cuts—which amount to more than 40 percent on some of the strategies—are part of the overall downward pressure on fees in the financial services industry, they are mainly aimed at institutional investors who are becoming much bigger clients for PowerShares.

 

IU: In the wake of a round of fee cuts from several ETF providers this year, has Invesco PowerShares felt pressured to join this race to the bottom in terms of ETF fees? Is that the motivation here for these recent cuts, or is that putting it too simplistically?

Fulton: This is a step toward something we started three or four years ago when we lowered the fees on some of our U.S.-based fundamental products, knowing we wanted to lower fees on some non-U.S.-based ETFs at some point, too. But we needed to discuss it internally and with our board, and we also needed to see some track record in terms of asset growth first, which we did.

I don’t necessarily see these fee cuts in connection with what other ETF providers are doing because those cuts have been more in the “plain” beta space, where what we have is fundamental-based products. We understand that the enhanced beta cost needs to be priced differently, but we still thought that while these funds have had some amount of success, they warranted a reduction of fees. It was all basic product management—that’s what drove it.

IU: Do the fee cuts reflect asset growth that’s been slower than expected?

Fulton: No. In fact, what we’ve seen in fundamental indexing is that it used to be used primarily by individual advisors, but it has grown to include more institutional users, so we needed to price these funds more competitively to appeal to a broader clientele.

In the case of the S&P products, specifically, we tried to bring those more in line with some of the other S&P-linked products like the PowerShares low-volatility offerings. It’s really about housekeeping, but we do hope it will help attract more assets.

 

ETF.COM CHANNELS

Interested in China? Use our China ETFs Channel, library, and ETF screener.

Interested in oil? Use our oil ETFs channel, library and ETF screener!

ETF DAILY DATA

The largest gold miners ETF lost assets on Thursday, April 28.

BlackRock's ETF assets gained $859 million on Thursday, April 28.

ETF.COM ANALYST BLOGS

By Drew Voros

With the broad equity ideas all taken, issuers look for thinner slices of exposure.

By David Lichtblau

How funds wash away capital gains through create/redeem process.

By Dave Nadig

End investors are the big winners; brokers—not so much.

By Dave Nadig

ETF industry petitions the SEC for market microstructure changes.

ETF INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVE

By Sprott Asset Management

New fund’s underlying index targets equities sentiment on social media.

By Kristi Kuechler

Avoid taking unrewarded—or unintended—risks.

By Vanguard

The investing giant outlines its expectations for the markets and global economy in 2016.