Finra, Exchanges Tweak Trading-Halt Plan

By
August 29, 2013
Share:

SEC receives the latest tweaking of the ETP new volatility-controlling trading plan.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, along with U.S. stock exchanges, are again tinkering with the New York Stock Exchange Arca’s new limit-up/limit-down (LULD) trading system program, offering up two main amendments to the pilot program that’s designed to address trading execution in highly volatile days.

In what amounts to a fifth proposed amendment to this pilot program first implemented in April, Finra and the exchanges involved in this effort suggested that the LULD program rejigger two major points: one relating to halts that take place late in the trading session, and the other focused on just which exchange-traded products should qualify for the program’s “Tier 1” stocks.

Essentially, the amendment suggests that NYSE Arca rethink the reopening of trading in a given stock if a trading halt occurs within 10 minutes of the closing of a regular trading session. As the program currently stands, the exchange would not reopen trading in a halted security for the remainder of the day if that halting happened within five minutes of the closing bell.

The argument here is that a five-minute window at the end of the session is too small—at too volatile a time of day—to allow for fairly reopening and closing trading again.

The note submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission this week also suggests that highly illiquid ETPs that don’t meet a notional average daily volume of $2 million be excluded from the program’s “Tier 1 Stocks” halting program because they are triggering too many halts that aren’t necessarily linked to the execution or to volatility of a security.

These illiquid securities were once included in that top-tier group of stocks even without meeting volume criteria because they track similar benchmarks to those ETPs that make the cut, according to the document. But their illiquid trade, and the wide quotes that are often associated with these stocks, are triggering halts that in no way reflect inadequate execution.

The latest round of verbiage is a stark reminder of just how difficult tackling the issue of excessive market volatility is, and this debate is far from over. In the end, exchanges and regulators are looking to implement a program that controls volatility in an effort to prevent trading accidents and sudden price movements such as what happened on May 6, 2010—the “flash crash.”

“The limit up-limit down mechanism is intended to reduce the negative impacts of sudden, unanticipated price movements in stocks, thereby protecting investors and promoting a fair and orderly market,” the document submitted to regulators said.

“The Participants believe that the proposed amendment meets the goals of the Plan, which is to address extraordinary market volatility,” it said.

 

ETF.COM CHANNELS

Learn why commodity ETFs are an essential part of a diversified portfolio with our Commodity ETFs channel.

Learn why bond ETFs are an essential part of a diversified portfolio with our bond ETF channel.

ETF DAILY DATA

The biotech ETF was the biggest loser in terms of outflows on Friday, Feb. 5.

Vanguard ETF assets ticked up on Friday, Feb. 5.

ETF.COM ANALYST BLOGS

By Dave Nadig

For all the hype, here’s an example of an ETF working just as it should.

By Matt Hougan

Here's why you should attend the largest ETF conference in the world next month.

By Dave Nadig

Barclays built in a premium to this exchange-traded note, so back away.

By Sumit Roy

Why this probably isn't the start of a bear market.

ETF INDUSTRY PERSPECTIVE

By Heidi Richardson

Opportunities in Germany and the eurozone.

By Shirish Malekar

How to protect your portfolio with liquid alts.