Index Investor Corner

Koenig: Factors Versus Styles

May 27, 2014

The style box is dead. Vive le style box!

The early 1980s was a time of tremendous innovation as technological advances spurred new products and thinking across industries from computing to music to autos to investing. 1981 brought us innovations such as IBM's first PC, the MTV video music network, the DeLorean sports car and the first institutional index fund.

A few years later, Russell Investments introduced the Russell 2000 Index, the first small-cap benchmark, followed by the first growth and value style indexes. Together, these indexes formed the basis for the now-well-known style box, and have helped shaped the way investors construct portfolios for many years.

Since that time, indexing has grown dramatically and is now seeing another era of innovation, with the introduction of a wide variety of factor indexes focused on individual factors such as low volatility, quality, momentum and value.

Factor investing has quickly graduated from playing open-mic night at small nightclubs to headlining the largest arenas. And investors are working to understand these strategies—how factors are similar to or different from traditional styles and how these strategies can be incorporated into their portfolios.

Some industry practitioners have asserted that factor investing might replace traditional styles and the style box. Others have dismissed factor investing altogether as a series of one-hit wonders, potentially positioning investors for disappointment down the road.

So, what's the right answer? Will factor investing prove to be as influential and lasting as indexing itself, or as short-lived as the DeLorean? As with any new concept, the answer is more nuanced than a simple thumbs-up or thumbs-down.

Factor indexes represent new tools that investors can use to construct more precise portfolios based on their unique objectives and tolerance for risk. For many, a combination of traditional styles and new factor strategies may provide the best solution for their investment needs.

Distinguishing Factors From Styles

Factors Styles
Market Coverage
  • Focused exposure to stocks with high capture of one targeted factor
  • One-sided subset of a market segment, e.g., High Momentum but no Low Momentum
  • Broad exposure to sets of characteristics
  • Splits market segments into symmetrical, two-sided components, e.g., Growth and Value
Factor Capture
  • High factor capture
  • Significant bet on targeted factor
  • Moderate factor capture
  • Moderate tilt toward factor characteristics
  • Factor-weighted
  • Market capitalization-weighted
  • Semiannual, quarterly or monthly rebalance
  • Higher turnover
  • Annual reconstitution
  • Low turnover
Active vs. Passive
  • High active share
  • Focused subset of parent index
  • Lower active share
  • Broader subset of parent index




Trying to figure out alternatives ETFs? Use our alternatives ETFs channel, library and ETF screener!

Want to learn more about smart-beta ETFs? Check out our smart-beta guide, essentials library and ETF screener!


'VWO' topped redemptions Tuesday, Sept. 1, as investors continued to trim exposure to international stock ETFs, particularly emerging market funds.

'SPY' and 'MDY' paced State Street's issuer-leading asset gains Tuesday, Sept. 1. Total U.S.-listed ETF assets slipped below $2 trillion.


By Dave Nadig

With many ETFs currently trading well off fair value, what’s an ETF investor to do? Don’t panic.

By Matt Hougan

Out-of-favor funds can bring attractive returns.

By Matt Hougan

New data from Charles Schwab show that the death of mutual funds is happening faster than we thought.

By Dave Nadig

Grab the popcorn. Precidian just doubled-down on its nontransparent active ETF proposal with the SEC this morning.


By John Del Vecchio

An index that goes long financially sound companies and shorts the ones with problematic balance sheets.

By Dan Draper

The nature of retirement is changing. How can investors adapt?

By Invesco PowerShares

A more in-depth look at the smart-beta survey's results.