Claymore Securities has filed a request with the Securities and Exchange Commission to launch three new exchange-traded funds, each of which would be actively managed.
The proposed ETFs would be advised by Claymore Advisors and subadvised by Huntington Beach, Calif.-based Delta Global Advisors.
Rather than following an index and using a quantitative type of stock-picking process, the ETFs would use more traditional actively managed styles similar to how mutual funds now operate.
Depending on the ETF, Delta Global would implement a bottom-up fundamental approach or rely on more technical analysis to evaluate companies. In some cases, both methodologies would be used to select stocks.
The ETFs that Claymore is asking regulators to approve are the:
- Claymore Delta Global Infrastructure ETF
- Claymore Delta Global Hard Assets ETF
- Claymore Delta Global Agribusiness ETF
Delta Global's indexing arm has already created the benchmark that's used for the Claymore/Delta Global Shipping ETF (NYSE: SEA). Here's a breakdown of each of the new actively managed ETFs being proposed:
Play On Infrastructure In Emerging Markets
The new infrastructure ETF would include stocks its managers believe are best-positioned to benefit from the growth of infrastructure projects in emerging markets. As explained in the filing, those would include: utilities, ports, airports, roads, railroads, water infrastructure and telecom build-outs. The portfolio would also invest in expansion relating to rising demand for basic materials and general engineering projects along more general infrastructure levels.
The case for investing in the field isn't exactly new. In fact, there has been much debate about whether "infrastructure" is simply a way to reinvent utilities as a more trendy global sector. (See related analysis on the actual role and nature infrastructure companies play in world markets here.)
Currently, some four pure-play infrastructure ETFs are being offered. All are index-driven. Three take a global view:
- The First Trust ISE Global Engineering and Construction Index Fund (NYSE: FLM) takes a different tack by de-emphasizing utilities. Those types of companies tend to dominate infrastructure markets, especially in smaller countries. (See related story here.)
- The iShares S&P Global Infrastructure Index (NYSE: IGF) was the second ETF in this space but has attracted the most assets. (See related story here.)
- The SPDR FTSE/Macquarie Global Infrastructure 100 ETF (NYSE: GII) was the first in this category, but has attracted just slightly more than $61 million in assets so far. (See related story here.)
The most direct competitor to this new Claymore actively managed fund would appear to be the PowerShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure Portfolio (NYSE: PXR). It's a concentrated portfolio that's thinly traded. And it has less than $24 million in assets, although it debuted in November during terrible market conditions.
By contrast, IGF has more than $200 million in assets and is about half the cost (0.48% versus 0.75%). But it also is lightly traded and, by far, has its biggest concentration in U.S. names.
Since getting a pop earlier this year when the Obama administration took over the White House, the global infrastructure ETFs have been settling around broader market trends. Going back to the past 12 months, they've been lagging.
But that's not the case for PXR. It was up more than 27% heading into Friday. By comparison, the SPDR S&P 500 Trust (NYSE: SPY) was up about 1.40% and the broadly diversified iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index (NYSE: EEM) was ahead by 22%-plus.
The big question with this new active Claymore ETF will be whether active management can really prove, over time, to be more effective than PXR's index-based approach. (See related story on how PXR's underlying index is constructed here.) Pricing will also no doubt play a significant role—will the new ETF undercut the PowerShares more passive version by much? And if so, will it be enough to give Delta Global an advantage right out of the gate?
Smart beta isn’t smarter than cap weighting, but it is different, and that’s great for investors.
Trial by fire is one way to discover why ETF transparency matters.
Most people now realize leveraged ETFs can hurt you, but how, then, to use them?
What would a shift out of a mutual fund and into an ETF look like up close?