Equity: China - Total Market
With 17 ETFs and over $8.48B in combined AUM, the Equity: China - Total Market segment provides exposure to the China space with a focus on Total Market securities.
Year-to-date, the best-performing ETF in the segment is the KraneShares CICC China Leaders 100 Index ETF (KFYP), with a total return of 30.10%. Meanwhile, the most popular ETF is the iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) with $4.30BB in assets under management.
Investors should take a look at the (). This fund has been chosen as an Analyst Pick by FactSet, thus is the best ETF for the average investor. has an expense ratio of -- and tracks the .
ETF.com Efficiency Insight
The average efficiency score in the Equity: China - Total Market segment is 65 out of 100, with the Franklin FTSE China ETF(FLCH) obtaining the highest rating of 91 out of 100.
Costs dominate the discussion around efficiency. ETFs in the segment have an average expense ratio of 0.61% per year, with the Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH) having the lowest expense ratio, charging investors 0.19% yearly.
Investors should look for funds with tight tracking, such as the KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF (KALL), with a 12-month median tracking difference of 0.11%.
ETF.com Tradability Insight
The average tradability score in the Equity: China - Total Market segment is 52 out of 100, with the iShares MSCI China ETF(MCHI) obtaining the highest rating of 91 out of 100.
The iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) is the undisputed segment leader when it comes to liquidity. The fund trades 303.41M in daily average volume. Investors should also find ample liquidity in the Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR), with $205.12M in daily dollar volume.
Use limit orders to trade funds such as the KraneShares CICC China Leaders 100 Index ETF(KFYP), due to their double-digit market spreads.
ETF.com Fit Insight
The MSCI All China IMI Index has been selected as the index that most accurately represents the market in question. The benchmark has been selected by the ETF Analytics team at FactSet, according to a series of guidelines to ensure this index accurately captures its market.
Investors trying to match a broad market exposure should pay attention to KALL. This fund obtains a high Fit score and investors should capture market-like returns.
Other funds diverge from the market, by nature of their investment mandates; for example, PGJ follows a Depositary Receipts strategy and obtains a low Fit score compared with our neutral benchmark.