Equity: U.S. MLPs
With 17 ETFs and over $13.65B in combined AUM, the Equity: U.S. MLPs segment provides exposure to the space with a focus on Energy securities.
Year-to-date, the best-performing ETF in the segment is the InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA), with a total return of 62.86%. Meanwhile, the most popular ETF is the Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) with $5.64BB in assets under management.
Investors should take a look at the (). This fund has been chosen as an Analyst Pick by FactSet, thus is the best ETF for the average investor. has an expense ratio of -- and tracks the .
ETF.com Efficiency Insight
The average efficiency score in the Equity: U.S. MLPs segment is -- out of 100, with the Global X MLP ETF(MLPA) obtaining the highest rating of -- out of 100.
Costs dominate the discussion around efficiency. ETFs in the segment have an average expense ratio of 0.81% per year, with the Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) having the lowest expense ratio, charging investors 0.35% yearly.
Investors should look for funds with tight tracking, such as the Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX), with a 12-month median tracking difference of -0.99%.
ETF.com Tradability Insight
The average tradability score in the Equity: U.S. MLPs segment is -- out of 100, with the Global X MLP ETF(MLPA) obtaining the highest rating of -- out of 100.
The Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) is the undisputed segment leader when it comes to liquidity. The fund trades 66.77M in daily average volume. Investors should also find ample liquidity in the Global X MLP ETF (MLPA), with $9.20M in daily dollar volume.
Use limit orders to trade funds such as the Credit Suisse S&P MLP Index ETN(MLPO), due to their double-digit market spreads.
ETF.com Fit Insight
The has been selected as the index that most accurately represents the market in question. The benchmark has been selected by the ETF Analytics team at FactSet, according to a series of guidelines to ensure this index accurately captures its market.
Investors trying to match a broad market exposure should pay attention to . This fund obtains a high Fit score and investors should capture market-like returns.
Other funds diverge from the market, by nature of their investment mandates; for example, follows a strategy and obtains a low Fit score compared with our neutral benchmark.