## [# Semiconductor ETFs 101: DRAM, EUV, SMH, SOXX, SOXL — The Complete Guide for 2026](/sections/equity/semiconductor-etfs-101-dram-euv-smh-soxx-soxl-complete-guide-2026)
# Semiconductor ETFs 101: DRAM, EUV, SMH, SOXX, SOXL — The Complete Guide for 2026
Semiconductor ETFs have been the defining investment story of 2026 — SOXX is up 90%, FTXL has doubled, and DRAM, the AI memory ETF, has grown from a niche fund to nearly $17 billion in assets. But the category has expanded far beyond "just buy SMH." This complete guide covers every major semiconductor ETF, from the AI memory pure-play to leveraged instruments built for traders only — and explains who each one is actually for.
[](/contributors/etfcom-staff)
[By ETF.com Staff](/contributors/etfcom-staff)
Jun 12, 2026
Edited by: ETF.com Staff
[ + Follow ](/etf/login)
Share Email LinkedIn Facebook X (Twitter)
googletag.cmd.push(function() {
googletag.display('js-dfp-tag-article_page_302x26');
});
Loading
Six months ago, if you'd asked most investors to name a semiconductor ETF, they would have said [**SMH**](https://www.etf.com/SMH) or maybe [**SOXX**](https://www.etf.com/SOXX). Today there are ETFs focused specifically on AI memory chips, chip-making lithography technology, and South Korean memory producers. There are triple-leveraged funds that gained 440% in H1 2026 — and their inverse equivalents, which lost nearly 90% (although it should be noted leveraged and inverse funds are designed to be held and measured on a daily basis, not over time).
The semiconductor ETF category has never been more diverse, or more confusing. This guide maps the full landscape.
## The Semiconductor ETF Landscape at a Glance
ETFFocusExpense RatioAUMH1 2026 ReturnBest For**SMH**Broad semiconductor (NVDA-heavy)0.35%$68.7B+68.78%Core long-term holding**SOXX**Broad semiconductor (more balanced)0.35%$38.5B+90.03%Core long-term holding**FTXL**Nasdaq semiconductor index0.60%$2.5B+100.06%Growth-tilted core**PSI**S&P semiconductor index0.60%$3.4B+94.81%Diversified core**XSD**Equal-weight semiconductor0.35%$3.3B+87.03%Diversified, mid-cap exposure**DRAM**AI memory chips (HBM)0.75%$16.7B~+77%AI infrastructure theme**EUV**EUV lithography technology0.75%~$500MEst. +80%+Chip-making equipment theme**SOXL**3× daily leveraged semi bull0.88%$25B+440%Short-term traders only**SOXS**3× daily leveraged semi bear0.88%~$800M-89.93%Short-term hedgers only
googletag.cmd.push(function() {
googletag.display('js-dfp-tag-in_article_unit');
});
## DRAM: The AI Memory Pure-Play
The [**Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM)**](https://www.etf.com/DRAM) is the most interesting new fund in the semiconductor category. Launched in 2025, it focuses on companies making high-bandwidth memory (HBM) — the specialized chips that AI accelerators like Nvidia's H100 and B200 need to process large models at speed.
Why does this matter? Traditional DRAM manufacturers like Micron, Samsung, and SK Hynix have spent decades in a brutal commodity cycle — prices rise, oversupply crashes them, repeat. HBM is different. It's technologically complex, supply-constrained, and AI companies need it badly enough to pay premium prices. Nvidia reportedly can't get enough of it.
DRAM has ridden this thesis to nearly $17 billion in assets — one of the fastest growth trajectories for any ETF in recent memory. It pulled in more than $2.5 billion in a single week in early June and recorded a single-day inflow of over $1 billion. Its YTD return of approximately 77% trails SOXX but reflects the fund's more concentrated, memory-specific approach.
DRAM holds roughly 20–25 stocks, concentrated heavily in SK Hynix, Micron, Samsung, and supporting memory ecosystem companies. It is more volatile than SMH or SOXX because it has more concentrated exposure to a single part of the chip stack. That's also why it has the potential to outperform in an AI infrastructure buildout — and underperform badly if memory prices weaken.
**Best for:** Investors who want to specifically express a view on AI memory demand rather than broad semiconductor exposure. Think of DRAM as a satellite position within a semiconductor allocation, not a replacement for SMH or SOXX.
## EUV: The Chip-Making Technology ETF
The [**Corgi Lithography & Semiconductor Photonics ETF (EUV)**](https://www.etf.com/EUV) focuses on companies involved in extreme ultraviolet lithography — the chip-making technology without which the most advanced semiconductors simply cannot be manufactured. ASML, the Dutch company that has an effective monopoly on EUV machines, is the dominant holding, but EUV also captures the surrounding ecosystem. This includes Cymer (now part of ASML, light sources) and materials companies whose products only work with EUV processes.
The investment thesis is that without EUV lithography, there are no 3nanometer (nm) or 2nm chips — and without 3nm or 2nm chips, there is no AI hardware at the frontier. This is a picks-and-shovels play on AI at the most fundamental level of the supply chain.
The EUV ticker page has drawn consistent interest on ETF.com, reflecting genuine investor curiosity about how to play this theme without direct investment in individual companies. For investors who already hold SMH or SOXX, EUV provides incremental concentration in chip-making equipment over chip manufacturers themselves.
**Best for:** Investors who want equipment and tool exposure rather than chip designer/manufacturer exposure. Complements rather than duplicates SMH or SOXX.
## SMH vs SOXX: The Broad Semiconductor Giants
The [**VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH)**](https://www.etf.com/SMH) and [**iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX)**](https://www.etf.com/SOXX) are the two most widely held semiconductor ETFs. They track different indexes and have meaningfully different performance profiles despite covering the same general category.
**SMH** tracks the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index — a market-cap-weighted index of 25 of the largest U.S.-listed semiconductor companies. Its largest holdings are Nvidia (around 15%+ weighting), TSMC, ASML, Broadcom, and AMD. SMH's heavy Nvidia concentration has been both its greatest strength (when NVDA runs) and its greatest risk.
SMH is the more liquid of the two, with daily trading volume and AUM ($68.7B) that dwarf most other sector ETFs. Its 0.35% expense ratio is competitive. It returned +68.78% YTD in H1 2026 — excellent by any normal standard, though it trailed SOXX.
**SOXX** tracks the ICE Semiconductor Index, which holds 30 stocks with a more equal-weight tilt. Its top holding cap is 8% at reset, which means no single name like Nvidia can dominate the way it does in SMH. As a result, SOXX captured more of the mid-cap semiconductor rally — it returned +90.03% YTD, outperforming SMH by more than 20 percentage points in H1 2026.
The performance difference reflects a structural reality: in a broad semiconductor bull market, more balanced exposure tends to win because mid-cap names rally faster off a lower base. In a market where Nvidia specifically is leading, SMH's concentration advantage flips the dynamic.
**Other options:**
- [**FTXL** (First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF](https://www.etf.com/FTXL), +100.06% YTD): Modified equal-weight, more mid-cap tilt, returned the most of any broad semi ETF in H1 2026
- [**PSI** (Invesco Dynamic Semiconductors ETF](https://www.etf.com/PSI), +94.81% YTD): Tracks an S&P semiconductor index, 30 stocks
- [**XSD** (SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF](https://www.etf.com/XSD), +87.03% YTD): True equal-weight, highest mid-cap exposure, most diversified
If the goal is a long-term core semiconductor holding, SOXX or SMH are the most sensible choices given their liquidity and scale. FTXL has outperformed but is a smaller fund with slightly higher fees. XSD suits investors who want to minimize mega-cap concentration risk.
## SOXL and SOXS: For Day Traders Only
The [**Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X Shares (SOXL)**](https://www.etf.com/SOXL) and its inverse counterpart [**SOXS**](https://www.etf.com/SOXS) are not investments — they are instruments. This distinction matters enormously and should only be considered by experienced investors.
SOXL delivers 3× the daily return of the ICE Semiconductor Index. In a strong uptrend, this is extraordinary. However, leveraged ETFs are rebalanced daily, which means they suffer from something called volatility decay (also known as beta slippage). On a volatile day where the index drops 5% then rises 5%, SOXL doesn't return to even — it loses ground. Over time, in a choppy market, this decay compounds and SOXL can lose value even if the underlying index is flat.
SOXL had one of the most dramatic stories in ETF flows in 2026: it saw a $2.3B outflow in a single week in late May after the semiconductor rally — traders took profits. Then on June 10, it pulled in $1.09B in a single day as traders re-entered for the next leg. This in-and-out pattern is exactly how SOXL is designed to be used: short time horizons, active management, rapid entry and exit.
SOXS, the bear version, returned -89.93% YTD. In a rising semiconductor market, SOXS destroys capital rapidly. It exists for hedging over very short periods — not as a long position.
**The rule is simple:** If your holding period is more than a few days, SOXL and SOXS are not appropriate. If you are an active trader using these as tactical instruments over hours or days, they serve their purpose — but only if you understand the volatility decay mechanics and manage positions actively.
## The South Korea Angle: EWY
One of the most remarkable stories of H1 2026 wasn't a semiconductor ETF at all — it was the[ **iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY)**](https://www.etf.com/EWY), which gained +122.90% YTD. The reason: Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix together represent a large portion of the Korean equity index, and both are dominant suppliers of HBM to AI chip manufacturers.
EWY is not a semiconductor ETF — it's a broad Korean equity fund that also holds banks, consumer companies, and industrials. But for investors who want AI memory exposure with implicit diversification and lower fees, EWY has been an unexpected vehicle. The concentration in Samsung and SK Hynix gives it semiconductor sensitivity without the explicit semiconductor ETF label or fee structure.
## Which Semiconductor ETF Is Right for You?
If you want...Best choiceA core, liquid long-term semiconductor holdingSMH or SOXXMaximum breadth, lower mega-cap concentrationSOXX or XSDPure AI memory / HBM exposureDRAMChip-making equipment / lithographyEUVNvidia-specific leverage within semisSMH (highest NVDA weight)Short-term trading, leveraged upsideSOXL (traders only)Short-term semiconductor hedgeSOXS (traders only, very short)Indirect AI memory play with built-in diversificationEWY## Bottom Line
Semiconductor ETFs in 2026 are no longer a one-size-fits-all category. SMH and SOXX remain the workhorses for long-term investors — liquid, diversified enough, and battle-tested. But the emergence of DRAM (AI memory), EUV (lithography), and their extraordinary performance this year reflects a real structural shift in where semiconductor value is being created: up the AI supply chain and into the specific components that are most supply-constrained.
Use SMH or SOXX as your core. Consider DRAM or EUV as focused satellites if you have a specific thesis. Leave SOXL and SOXS to traders who know exactly what they're doing.
[ + Follow ](/etf/login)
[ETF.com Staff](/contributors/etfcom-staff)
etf.com is the single source for ETF intelligence. We provide real-time ETF news and analysis to educate investors and drive financial knowledge in… [View Bio](/contributors/etfcom-staff)
Related Topics [Semiconductors](http://www.etf.com/topics/semiconductors)
[Equity](http://www.etf.com/topics/equity)
[Thematics](http://www.etf.com/topics/thematic-etfs)
[Leveraged](http://www.etf.com/topics/leveraged)