The Case For Commodities ETNs

December 09, 2011

Investors frustrated with the back-and-forth going on in the equities market are probably considering moving into commodities.

In the midst of our Inside Commodities conference, I’ve been thinking about the various commodities funds out there, and was surprised at the distribution of assets among them. I know a lot of people are hesitant to put their money in ETNs—credit risk sounds scary. But there are some very real advantages to ETNs, such as perfect tracking, that can make them well worth the risk.

To make my point, we need to start with an ETF: the iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed ETF (NYSEArca: GSG). As its name suggests, it seeks to track the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. It doesn’t pull that off very well, as the graph below shows. In fact, GSG’s returns often differ from the GSCI’s by 1 percent or more!

GSG's tracking error

 

In comparison, the iPath S&P GSCI Total Return Index ETN (NYSEArca: GSP) tracks the same S&P GSCI Total Return Index perfectly—and at the same 0.75 percent price as GSG.

This perfect tracking resulted in GSP outperforming GSG by over 1 percent over the past year. At its most extreme point, in April of this year, GSP was beating GSG by 3 percent!

GSG vs GSP returns

 

As I said, both funds have the same 0.75 percent expense ratio, so in a perfect world, both should be lagging their index by 0.75 percent. Instead, GSG lags by a significant amount beyond its expense ratio.

So what’s up with the discrepancy between the two funds?

GSG, the ETF, has only one real holding in addition to its collateral—a GSCI Excess Return March 2014 futures contract. Note that there’s a difference between the ETF’s “excess” return and the index’s “total” return.

Excess return only measures the returns above those which would be earned by cash collateral, while total return includes everything. In theory, GSG’s management of its collateral should work to equate the two indexes. But lately it hasn’t.

The baffling thing to me is that GSG currently has $1.3 billion invested in it, while the almost-identical-but-better GSP only has $99 million. Maybe it’s the credit-risk factor that’s holding GSP back, but if you can handle it, GSP is the better choice.

Whether your commodities index of choice is the GSCI is another whole story. But if it is your choice, at least make sure that you choose a product that tracks its index.

 

Find your next ETF

Reset All