An actively managed ETF, ‘TTFS,’ marks its three-year anniversary with mixed results.
An ETF hit its three-year anniversary recently, an important milestone for any fund. The AdvisorShares TrimTabs Float Shrink ETF (TTFS | C-76) has had success in its first three years: building a decent asset base, establishing workable liquidity and delivering strong returns relative to the market.
Still, three perspectives on the fund—two from ratings providers and one derived from the fund’s objectives—differ significantly.
The Pundits’ Views
Upon its three-year mark, the fund has earned five out of five stars from Morningstar. This means the ETF has outperformed its peers on a risk-adjusted basis over the past three years per Morningstar’s methodology.
Here at ETF.com, TTFS’ ranking is C-76. The letter grade measures the costs and risks of fund ownership, along with liquidity. TTFS’s letter grade (C on an A-F scale) suffers mostly because of its fee of 99 basis points, or $99 for each $10,000 invested. That’s quite high for a U.S. equity ETF, even if it’s on par with some active mutual funds.
The “76” part of the score—which we call its “Fit” score—means the fund’s performance and holdings don’t align well with a marketlike benchmark.
The Fit score is similar to active share except that a high Fit score implies “less active” and a low score means “more active.” Since TTFS aims to beat, rather than match, the market, a 76 out of 100 means it’s no “closet indexer” and indeed makes some significant bets away from the market.
The Fund’s Own Goals
Rankings aside, TTFS clearly states its own performance goals relative to a benchmark. It aims for “long-term returns in excess of the total return of the Russell 3000 Index, with less volatility than the Index,” to quote the fund’s home page.
With three years of history, has the fund met its two stated goals?
The answer is yes to the first goal: TTFS beat its benchmark handily. I’m using the iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV | A-100) as an investable proxy for the Russell 3000 Index. TTFS has annualized returns of 21.3 percent in the past three years, or 2.4 percentage points more than IWV. And that’s net of the high fee I mentioned above.