Volatile equity markers, environmental regulations and rising costs for miners create head winds that physical gold doesn’t encounter.
One of the big debates of 2011 was whether the performance discrepancy between physical gold prices and gold equities was going to diverge back to normal. As you may recall, gold equities grossly underperformed gold bullion throughout 2011. For most of the year, gold prices traded anywhere between 15 to 40 percent higher than their equity counterparts.
Many commentators predicted the performance divergence between bullion and equities would narrow. As the end of the first half of 2012 comes near, let’s take a look at the relative performance measures between bullion and equities, try to understand what happened and attempt to determine the outlook as we enter the second half of the year.
As 2011 closed, the market experienced a gaping difference between gold stocks and physical gold. Specifically, while gold bullion prices in 2011, as measured by the SPDR Gold Shares ETF (NYSE: GLD), were up 11.64 percent, gold equities, as measured by the Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF (NYSE: GDX), were down 14.50 percent.
Fast-forward to today, and the divergent performance between GLD and GDX still exists: While GLD is up 6.14 percent year-to-date, GDX is down 9.71 percent. Going forward, expect this divergence to continue. And for the reasons below, gold bullion will continue outperforming gold equities for the rest of 2012.
Volatile Stock Markets
Gold stocks are just that, stocks that are traded on global capital markets on a daily basis. As such, they are treated by investors first as stocks, and then as physical gold proxies. Ever since the financial crisis of 2008, global capital markets have never fully recovered their previously steady state of affairs. Since 2008, markets have been characterized by extreme and unpredictable volatility.
Let’s use initial public offerings (IPOs) as a measure of market stability. Prior to 2008, the NYSE and Nasdaq had a steady and certain stream of IPOs coming to market. Since 2008, the number of IPOs has dropped off a cliff, down some 40 percent. Even more alarming is the number of canceled IPOs — companies who were prepared and geared up for an IPO but were forced to postpone or even cancel their stocks sales due to volatile markets.
For example, in August 2011, eight out of the 11 companies scheduled to go public canceled their offerings; even The Carlyle Group, one of the pre-eminent global investors, was forced to postpone its offering due to market conditions.