Think about the following historical scenario: For the period 1927-1979, small value stocks (Fama-French small value stocks ex-utilities) outperformed the total market portfolio at 13.2 percent a year versus 8.8 percent a year. As a result, you decide to load up your portfolio on small value stocks. For the next 20-year period, 1980-1999, small value stocks returned 16.6 percent a year, underperforming the total market portfolio by 0.9 percentage points a year.
Would you have had the discipline to stay the course?
I ask, because over the next four years, 2000-2003, small value stocks outperformed the total market by 25.1 percentage points a year, 20.4 percent a year versus -4.7 percent. Over the full 24-year period, small-value stocks outperformed the total market by 3.8 percentage points a year, 17.2 percent a year versus 13.4 percent. Again, the only way you earned that higher return was to patiently wait out the 20-year period of underperformance.
Understand The Risks
Hopefully, the above examples make clear that before you invest in any strategy (asset allocation), you should fully understand the nature of its risks and be prepared to experience long periods of underperformance. These examples should make it quite clear that it’s possible the period of underperformance might even last for the majority of your investment horizon (or all of it).
That doesn’t mean a strategy is a bad one. It just means the risks involved happened to show up during a period where it mattered to you. In other words, because none of us has a clear crystal ball, a strategy must be judged as the right one or the wrong one before we invest.
You shouldn’t judge strategies based on ex-post outcomes, as they can be the result of random (both good and bad) outcomes.
Don’t Be ‘Fooled By Randomness’
Nassim Nicholas Taleb, author of “Fooled by Randomness,” put it this way:
“Lucky fools do not bear the slightest suspicion that they may be lucky fools—by definition, they do not know that they belong to such a category. They will act as if they deserve the money. The lucky fool [is] defined as a person who benefited from a disproportionate share of luck but attributes his success to some other, generally very precise, reason.”
Larry Swedroe is the director of research for the BAM Alliance, a community of more than 140 independent registered investment advisors throughout the country.