These ETF Issuer/Index Provider Tie-Ups Saw Big Demand

A look at the biggest inflows between ETF issuers and index companies.

Reviewed by: Todd Rosenbluth
Edited by: Todd Rosenbluth

While Charles Schwab, PowerShares and Guggenheim had strong ETF inflows in 2016, others were bigger beneficiaries of the increased usage.

Specifically, the three largest providers—BlackRock’s iShares, Vanguard and State Street Global Advisors—pulled in 88% of the ETF inflows, according to FactSet data, benefiting from a variety of relationships with index providers. However, some were more meaningful than others.

While the S&P 500 Index is licensed to many different ETF providers, the more typical scenario has an ETF provider licensing a distinct benchmark from an index provider that results in a product’s unique holdings and performance. In many—but not all—cases, the ETF lists the index in its name, providing transparency and marketing benefits.

According to First Bridge Data, ETFs offered by State Street that seek to replicate an S&P Dow Jones index pulled in $40 billion in 2016. Demand accelerated in December, with $14 billion alone in these ETFs.

Sector Flows

While the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) was by the far the strongest asset gatherer, certain sector-focused offerings such the Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) were additional drivers for 2016. However, not all sector products were in favor, as the Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP) experienced moderate outflows.

S&P Global owns S&P Dow Jones Indices, but sold its Equity and Fund Research business to CFRA in October 2016.

ETFs tied to S&P Dow Jones also helped BlackRock’s iShares to gather $36 billion in assets, with $2.1 billion in December. The iShares Core S&P Small Cap ETF (IJR), part of the firm’s lower-cost Core Series, was highly popular last year. Meanwhile, iShares sector products tied to an S&P Dow Jones index, such as the iShares US Financials ETF (IYF), received limited interest.

Source: First Bridge Data


Other Index Partnerships

In contrast, BlackRock’s relationship with MSCI is focused more on market-cap-weighted international equities and smart-beta products. These ETFs gathered $25 billion in assets, with $1.5 billion in December. Examples of popular products included the iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and the iShares Edge MSCI Minimum Volatility USA ETF (USMV).

Meanwhile, Vanguard’s strongest equity index provider relationship in December was with FTSE Russell. ETFs tied to these indices received $2 billion, higher than the $1.3 billion for S&P Dow Jones indices-based ETFs. Overall, aided by strong demand for the Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) and the Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets (VWO), FTSE Russell-linked ETFs contributed $23 billion of new money to Vanguard’s coffers in 2016.

Within fixed income, Barclays indices—acquired by Bloomberg—remains the dominant provider. However, Vanguard gathered $25 billion in fixed-income assets, moderately ahead of iShares’ $24 billion in 2016. The Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund (VCSH) and the iShares Core US Aggregate Bond (AGG) are examples of such popular fixed-income ETFs.

Other ETF Issuers Use Same Index Providers

The same companies that license indices to support the above iShares, Vanguard and SSGA ETFs also provided the backbone to popular products for more moderately sized asset managers.

The smart-beta offerings Guggenheim S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and the PowerShares S&P 500 High Dividend/Low Volatility (SPHD) seek to replicate a distinct S&P Dow Jones index, while the Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) tracks a FTSE Russell index.

Country Exposure of Popular ETFs Can Be Different

Source: CFRA Research

In ranking more than 950 equity ETFs, CFRA does not focus on how well an ETF tracks its index. The 140 basis point difference in the one-year record between IEFA and VEA has more to do with the distinct exposures they provide.

For example, IEFA has a higher weighting to Japan (25% of assets), while VEA alone has exposure to Canada (9%). We offer valuation and risk assessments on each of an ETF’s holdings, combined with analysis of its costs and technical trends.

At the time of writing, neither the author nor his firm held any of the securities mentioned. Todd Rosenbluth is director of ETF and mutual fund research at CFRA, an independent research firm that acquired S&P Global Market Intelligence's equity and fund business in October 2016. He can be reached at [email protected]. Follow him at @ToddCFRA


Todd Rosenbluth is director of ETF and mutual fund research at CFRA, an independent research firm that acquired S&P Global Market Intelligence’s equity and fund business in October 2016. Follow him at @ToddCFRA.