For many investors, the difference may seem esoteric. But as ETF.com has extensively covered, custodial risk is one of the largest unresolved issues facing any existing or potential marijuana ETF.
If the approach is approved, it may potentially resolve the biggest hurdle that has prevented issuers from launching additional marijuana ETFs to compete with the market's sole offering, the ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ).
What Is A Custodian?
An ETF's custodian plays an often-overlooked role: Custodians are in charge of holding a fund's portfolio securities and cash, as well as making and receiving payments on behalf of the fund with respect to its securities. Without custodians, ETFs can't exist.
Until recently, most big U.S. banks have declined to serve as custodians for marijuana ETFs, because holding stocks involved with a drug still outlawed by the U.S government could potentially run the bank afoul of federal banking laws (read: "Promise & Peril Of Marijuana ETFs").
That's true even though the majority of investable marijuana stocks are domiciled in Canada, where marijuana is fully legal. Though those companies may fall outside the jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of Justice, the custodian bank holding those stocks does not.
Because of this lack of willing custodians, no new marijuana ETF proposals have been filed with the SEC since last year, nor have any existing proposals been approved, despite the marijuana industry's explosive growth in 2018.
MJ's Custodian Trouble
The custodian issue first came to light through the unusual way in which the market's sole marijuana fund, MJ, came to launch.
Instead of the usual filing-to-launch process, ETF Managers Group (ETMFG) retrofitted one of its existing ETFs with a new index. Prior to Dec. 26, 2017, MJ tracked Latin America real estate, and carried the ticker "LARE" (read: "When An ETF Changes Its Exposure").
In so doing, ETMFG circumvented the need to find a new custodian for its fund or to get the SEC's green light for a totally new ETF. Despite the dramatic difference in indexes between LARE and MJ, the ETF had already been approved once and would not need to be reapproved. Neither did ETMFG need approval from LARE's custodian, U.S. Bank, before making the change.
Prior to MJ's index switch, U.S. Bank had demonstrated little appetite for a marijuana ETF, turning down multiple proposals similar to the fund from other issuers. Indeed, ETFMG's decision to transform LARE into a marijuana fund almost immediately sparked debate within the bank over whether to continue serving as custodian for the fund.
In September, ETFMG and U.S. Bank parted ways, and MJ switched custodians to Wedbush Securities, one of the largest investment banks in the Western U.S. Though Wedbush has all the same clearing and settling capabilities in-house that U.S. Bank does, it is a much smaller institution than its predecessor, with $2 billion in assets under management, according to its most recently filed ADV. (U.S. Bank has roughly $462 billion in assets under management.)
What's more, Wedbush Securities is a private company, meaning it need not meet the same federal regulatory guidelines as publicly traded companies. However, it is still subject to federal banking law and holds FDIC insurance (read: "Marijuana ETF Shifts Custody").