Int'l Value: It’s What’s For Reflation

Int'l Value: It’s What’s For Reflation

It’s not clear if value has bounced back for the long term.

Reviewed by: Ben Lavine
Edited by: Ben Lavine

This article is part of a regular series of thought leadership pieces from some of the more influential ETF strategists in the money management industry. Today’s article features Benjamin Lavine, co-chief investment officer for 3D/L Capital Management, in Hartford, Connecticut.

Lost in the "value versus growth” debate is how the investment-style boxing match is playing out internationally. With the post-pandemic recovery largely tracking the pace of vaccination progress, investors may want to turn their attention to some of the “values” being served up in international developed markets across Europe and Asia.

Although having been late to the vaccination rollout and still wrestling with post-Brexit trade issues, investors are starting to price in a strong reflationary recovery across the eurozone, whether in currency appreciation versus the U.S. dollar, rising inflation expectations priced into sovereign debt, or the recent outperformance of regional stock markets versus the U.S. and Asia (at least so far in May).

Will Developed Markets Take The Global Growth Lead From Emerging Post-COVID?

Although the U.S. retains the lead on post-COVID recovery with early and aggressive vaccine rollouts and massive fiscal spending, the Asia growth story is presenting a different picture, particularly in China, where pro-cyclical indicators such as credit impulse (a measure of change in total social financing) and broader money supply growth are exhibiting signs of deceleration and possible outright contraction.

Figure 1 displays the Bloomberg China Credit Impulse Index juxtaposed against the IFO Pan Germany Business Climate Index, a proxy for business sentiment across the Eurozone. Unlike the pre- and post-Great Financial Crisis period of 2008-2009, where both China credit and European business sentiment fell and rose together, the post-COVID period has witnessed a growing divergence.

We believe one of the bigger macro debates to emerge over the next year is whether the export-driven global growth baton is being passed from China to Europe (really Germany), or whether China will continue its position as the gravitation center of global growth trends as it has served in the past several cycles.


Figure 1: Bloomberg China Credit Impulse Diverges From Germany Business Sentiment

Pop-up Image

Source: Bloomberg

(For a larger view, click on the image above)


If the latter, then we very well could see a shift in the global growth narrative that has both Europe and Japan (a leading manufacturer in automation and robotics) leading the post-COVID recovery through increased industrial spending and export growth, despite longer-term issues related to aging demographics and slowing population growth.

An Even More Compelling Value Opportunity Outside The US Market?

The “value” investment style has been heavily out of favor, not just in the U.S. but across global markets, for the past several years up until the COVID vaccines were announced last November. International value investing has suffered even more than the U.S. since ex-U.S. companies are generally less profitable, with lower returns on capital versus their U.S.-based counterparts.

By definition, “value”-based portfolios and indices will trade at a discount to the broader market on market capitalization-weighted basis, but we saw these valuation spreads widen dramatically throughout 2020 as “growth” style investing took off, driven by technology and highflier initial public offerings focused on digital disintermediation.

The dour sentiment among the value-focused in 2020 was only matched by similar experiences felt during the late 1990s Internet Boom. With post-COVID reflation on investors’ minds as pent-up demand crashes headlong into bottlenecked supplies, 2021 has witnessed a strong comeback for “value” over “growth.”

For international stocks in particular, what we find interesting is that the valuation of “value” stocks, as proxied by the iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF (IVLU), has not meaningfully appreciated relative to the valuation of the broader international developed markets, as proxied by the iShares MSCI EAFE ETF (EFA).

Using 12-month forward price/earnings multiples (based on Bloomberg consensus EPS estimates), Figure 2 displays the historical quarterly valuations of IVLU and as a percentage of the valuation of the broader market (EFA). Even with the market renewing its love affair with value style investing, the valuation discount remains significantly wider versus five years ago.


Figure 2: Little Love For ‘Int’l Value’ As P/E Valuations Have Remained Stagnant Over Time & Whose Discount Vs The Broader Market Remains Wide Vs 5 Years Ago

Pop-up Image

Source: Bloomberg

(For a larger view, click on the image above)


Now this valuation discount is understandable, because value stocks tend to be less profitable (or generate lower returns on capital) versus the broader market. This lower profitability helps explain the historical risk premium afforded to value investing when seen through a Fama/French lens (although behavioralists would argue otherwise).

Yet the “quality” of international value stocks has actually improved coming out of COVID, while the projected return on equity (ROE) gap between IVLU and EFA has narrowed (Figure 3). In today’s post-COVID recovery, value investors are enjoying more “quality” bang for their “value” buck.


Figure 3: IVLU Valuations Have Stagnated Despite An Improving ROE Profile

Pop-up Image

Source: Bloomberg

(For a larger view, click on the image above)


Why so little love for value? Is this quality improvement just “transitory” and largely a result of base effects from the prior year’s pandemic troughs? Could international value face peak profitability (and disappoint long-suffering investors yet again), succumbing to longer-term head winds of poor demographics and lower capital efficiency?

Perhaps, but at least for now, investors are paying about as much for international value as they were five years ago despite an improved ROE profile coming on top of a clearer runway for a post-COVID-driven recovery, especially if the ex-U.S. developed regions take the lead on global growth. Borrowing from an old American beef campaign, “Value: It’s What’s for Reflation.”


At the time of this writing, 3D held positions in IVLU and EFA. The above is the opinion of the author and should not be relied upon as investment advice or a forecast of the future. It is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or implement any investment strategy. It is for informational purposes only. The above statistics, data, anecdotes, and opinions of others are assumed to be true and accurate however 3D/L Capital Management does not warrant the accuracy of any of these. There is also no assurance that any of the above are all inclusive or complete.

Content Not To Be Construed as a Recommendation or Determination of Suitability: The material in this article has been prepared for informational purposes only without regard to any particular user's investment objectives or financial situation. The fact that 3D/L Capital Management has made this information available to you on constitutes neither a recommendation to enter into a particular transaction nor a representation that any product described in this article is suitable or appropriate for you. In particular, the fact that a third party manager or fund is featured on in this article should not be viewed as a recommendation or endorsement of such third party manager or fund.

This article does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to purchase interests in any investment vehicles or securities. This article is not a prospectus, an advertisement, or an offering of any interests in either the Strategy or other portfolios. This article and the information contained herein is intended for informational purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice or a recommendation with respect to investment. Investing in any strategy should only occur after consulting with a financial advisor.

3D/L does not approve or otherwise endorse the information contained in links to third-party sources. 3D/L is not affiliated with the providers of third-party information and is not responsible for the accuracy of the information contained therein.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. None of the services offered by 3D/L Capital Management are insured by the FDIC and the reader is reminded that all investments contain risk. The opinions offered above are as of May 20, 2021 and are subject to change as influencing factors change.

3D/L Capital management is not offering, and is not authorized to offer, interests in any registered funds. Such offering is made only by prospectus which is available through FINRA registered broker-dealers.

More detail regarding 3D/L Capital Management, its products, services, personnel, fees, and investment methodologies are available in the firm’s Form ADV Part 2, which is available upon request by calling (860) 291-1998, option 2, or emailing [email protected] or visiting 3D/L’s website at or from the SEC at

Ben Lavine is CIO of 3D Asset Management, based in East Hartford, Connecticut.